Archeological findings show that Nazareth was an agricultural town of only two hundred inhabitants. This explains why there are no previous references to it and why this village is not cited among the forty-five towns listed by Flavius Josephus, a Jewish historian at the time, nor mentioned in the Talmud among the sixty-three towns in Galilee.
Revealing the Existence of Families of a High Lineage
In fact, however modest the village of Nazareth may have been, there were still some families of noble descent among the residents there, as two of its following special features show:
To whom could this home and this tomb belong if not to people of genteel standing?
In Aramean, the term “nazor” or “nazir” means “prince” or “crown” or “tonsure”; the Nazoreans were either people from a royal house or consecrated to God (tonsured means keeping a “crown” of hair). The descendants of the Northern branch of the illustrious family of king David - among them Joseph and Mary - lived in Nazareth. This Northern line of David’s house, which had reigned over Israel during centuries past, had been pushed to the side during the time of the Maccabees, when the leaders of the Hebraic nation were no longer chosen from this branch of the royal family. And the place where the heirs of this ousted princely family retired was called… Nazareth.
Nathanael’s Famous Comment
Therefore, it is not because the village is small that Nathanael replies famously to the apostle Philip in the Gospels:
“Can anything good come from Nazareth?” (Jn 1:46)
This comment does not refer to the insignificance of the village, but to the failure of the illustrious descendants of this disgraced line of David who lived a retired life in Nazareth. So “what good can come from Nazareth… ?”
The list of the articles in this section:
- The history of the people of Israel
- Israel at the time of Jesus
- Our current knowledge about Nazareth
- Our sources of knowledge
See also :
About the basilica of the Annunciation in Nazareth
About Jesus’ childhood home in Galilee